 |
 |
Ethical Implications of Cases Involving
Motor Vehicle Accidents
By John Booth Farese
"a law firm may be vicariously liable for its attorney's conduct"
1) Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v.
Foster, 528 So. 2d 255 (Miss. 1988), is probably
one of the most important cases involving
ethical considerations in representing clients
involved in a motor vehicle accident. The
plaintiff filed suit against Foster. Hartford
Accident and Indemnity Company had the liability
coverage for Foster. Prior to and during the
trial the plaintiff made several settlement
offers (all within the policy limits) to defense
counsel. These offers were rejected. The jury
returned a verdict well above the limits of
liability. Subsequently, Foster filed suit
against Hartford claiming bad faith refusal to
settle the case within the policy limits.
Foster's complaint also alleged breach of
fiduciary duty.
The Supreme Court found that when offers to
settle are made, the insurer has a fiduciary duty to
look after the insured's interest and to make a
knowledgeable, honest and intelligent evaluation of the
claim. If this is not done, then the carrier is liable
to the insured for all damages occasioned thereby. The
Court further noted the problems that arise in the
"insurance triangle" where the attorney is representing
the insurance company who in turn represents the
interests of the insured. The Court found that the
insurance defense attorneys had a duty to notify the
insured that he/she should consider employing his own
counsel and to inform him/her of any settlement offers.
Foster exemplifies the attorney/client relationship when
an attorney represents both an insurance company and the
insured in a motor vehicle accident. If the interests of
both clients parallel one another, this is acceptable
practice; however, duties and obligations may arise that
require the attorney to advise the insured to seek other
counsel.
2) Mississippi State Bar v. Blackmon, 600 So. 2d
166 (Miss. 1992). The initial litigation involved a
motor vehicle accident. The Mississippi Supreme Court
hear the matter because of allegations of attorney
misconduct. The Court found that an attorney had a duty
to properly investigate his client's address; and that
it was a breach of duty to fail to follow suggested
procedures for calculating attorney's fees. The Court
specifically mentioned that consideration should be
given to the amount of time and effort required in
handling a case. As stated in Blackmon and Levi v.
Mississippi State Bar, 436 So. 2d 781 (Miss. 1983),
attorneys should not urge a client to make statements or
do some act that will benefit the attorney or the
attorneys associates more than the client. Several
ethical issues are presented in these cases, another
being that attorneys should be especially cautious when
handling a minor's case.
3) The Mississippi Bar v. John Land, decided on
December 21, 1994, Supreme Court No. 93-BA-00806
involved a Complaint against Attorney Land for failure
to disclose material facts, making false statements and
general misconduct. The Complaint Tribunal found no
misconduct by Land, but the Supreme Court determined
that Attorney Land had withheld information regarding
the cause of his client's injury which the opposing
counsel discovered through other means.
4) The Rules of Professional Conduct in
Mississippi, 60 Miss. Law Journal 550 (1990) by
Professor William Champion is a "must" for attorneys to
read.
5) It should be noted that since a law firm may
be vicariously liable for its attorney's conduct great
care should be taken to avoid ethical traps. See Entente
Mineral Co. v. Parker, 956 F. 2d 524 (5th Cir. 1992).
Sections 79-12-17, 79-12-25 Mississippi Code of 1972,
Annotated as amended.
Back to Top
CHECK LIST OF SOME AREAS IN
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS OF CONCERN
(ETHICAL/MALPRACTICE)
- Are you representing two or more injured parties
in the same accident?______
- If so, is one of your clients a driver and one a
passenger?________
- Are you representing two persons (including but
not limited to a husband and a wife) injured in an
accident when one is a passenger and the other is the
driver and where one of the possible defenses may be
contributory negligence of the driver of the car in
which your clients were traveling?_______
- Are you attempting to represent two or more
persons in the same accident and the total damages of
the clients exceed the available insurance
coverage?_________
- Have you settled a minor's accident case and a
guardianship is opened?________
- Are you still considered the attorney of record
for the guardianship after the case is
settled?________
- Do you have a written contract of employment that
is clear and unambiguous?_______
- Do you personally explain how the attorney's fee
and expenses are calculated?________
- Do you have a settlement sheet which clearly
explains were every penny of the settlement
goes?______
- Do you settle cases on a structured payment
basis?______
- Do you have an independent economist or company
compute the present cash value of settlements with
structured payments?_______
- Do you keep time and expense records on each motor
vehicle accident case?________
- Do you get specific authority from a client before
you make an offer to settle?_________
- Do you confirm the authority from your to settle
for a specific amount in writing?________
- Do you confirm all offers to settle to the client
or insurance carrier and the insured in writing?_____
- Do you send your client a copy of all discovery
requests by the opposite party?________
- Do you have your client read and approve all
discovery responses before filing the same?________
- Do you review all discovery responses with your
client prior to the discovery deadline?________
- Do you check the statements made by your client
and all other relevant facts to prior his/her
deposition by checking accident reports, witness
statements, medical records, etc.?________
- Do you always visit the scene of the accident
prior to trying a case?_______
- Do you, your staff or investigator talk to all
known witnesses prior to a trial?________
- Do you give your client your opinion, in writing,
about problems with the case prior to trial?________
Back to Top
|
 |
 |